Public Administration and Government Calibration
Public overview of UAIF-CAL-PUBADMIN-v1.0; the operational package is controlled.
Purpose and scope
Public-administration, public-service and governmental decision-support AI within applicable rights and accountability boundaries.
The package calibrates UAIF classification for sector context without replacing the UAIF Technical Specification or applicable law.
Status and validation boundary
Version 1.0 is provisional pending empirical inter-rater validation. The source document states that provisional weights must not be used as the sole basis for regulatory reporting, certification or consequential decisions.
Public information
- Document reference: UAIF-CAL-PUBADMIN-v1.0
- Version: v1.0 provisional
- Public scope and exclusions
- Method based on public regulatory material, research and recognised severity frameworks
- Known validation and legal-review limitations
Sector risk context
Public-administration AI determines access to entitlements, services, and procedural fairness for entire populations, often for those with no alternative provider and limited means to contest decisions. Here Security_Integrity represents deprivation of rights, procedural fairness, democratic participation, and access to essential services — not merely cybersecurity compromise. Wrongful automated eligibility denial, social-scoring practices, and bypassed human review are the defining vectors.
1.1 Applicable Regulations
• EU AI Act — Annex III high-risk: access to essential public services and benefits; prohibited social-scoring practices [T1]
• GDPR Article 22 (automated decisions) [T1]
• India DPDP Act 2023 [T1]
• Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI (2024) [T1]
Extracted from the source sector profile. Detailed calibration and operational material remains controlled.
Public sector orientation
Representative classification concerns include lawful authority, public-service eligibility, due process, records, procurement, transparency, rights impact and appeal. These themes help teams scope incident intake and analysis; they are not calibration weights, legal conclusions or an exhaustive risk list.
Use with the UAIF layers
- Establish incident identity, provenance and remediation state.
- Separate cause, manifestation, acute harm and chronic-harm proxies.
- Apply severity and context logic with the provisional calibration status visible.
- Record sector and jurisdiction metadata for human review and routing.
- Preserve uncertainty, contrary evidence and the version of every referenced artifact.
Controlled resource
The detailed package, calibration weights, scoring implementation, evidence logic and maintenance material are confidential commercial resources governed by UAIF-LIC-003 and applicable GEL terms.
Notably Absent
No empirical validation result, regulatory approval, certification status, universal sector applicability or legal-reporting determination is claimed.